In today’s digitized world, the line between personal exposure, business risk and technological threat is fading.
Your voice can be cloned. Your smart home can be hacked. Employees can unknowingly feed confidential data into AI tools.
These aren’t hypothetical risks; they’re embedded in how leaders now work, communicate and protect their companies.
For executives, the question has shifted from “Am I covered?” to “Am I covered for the right risks?”
In this AI-driven era, your employees can pose a significant cyber threat, and your insurance must adapt accordingly.
SIGN UP FOR TBBW’S FREE NEWSLETTER
The executive risk gap
At ME Wilson, we’ve spent more than a century protecting legacies. Over that time, we’ve watched the insurance industry shift from relationship-driven independence to transactional partnerships.
Now, as AI transforms every facet of business, a dangerous disconnect has emerged between what executives believe is covered and what actually is.
We call it the Executive Risk Gap.
NOVEMBER COVER: How Tampa’s Ashley Butler turned struggle into success
Many executives assume their Directors & Officers (D&O), umbrella and cyber policies protect them from litigation, reputational damage and data breaches. In reality, most policies stop at the boardroom.
They rarely extend to personal or family risks or to misuse related to AI.
Personal coverage often lags behind modern life, missing protection for luxury smart tech, digital identity theft or simulated voice fraud. Even family offices may carry tens of millions in uncovered exposure.
Shadow AI: The internal threat
One of the fastest-growing vulnerabilities isn’t a foreign hacker — it’s internal misuse of AI tools.
From assistants to executives, employees use AI to draft emails, summarize meetings and analyze data. In doing so, they may upload sensitive financials, client information or trade secrets into unregulated systems.
According to Microsoft, 75% of employees use AI tools without company visibility.
This “shadow AI” is unmonitored, unregulated and, in most cases, uninsured.
Policies written for a pre-AI world
Most insurance policies were written before ChatGPT even existed. Many don’t mention AI at all. Some carriers have gone further — adding exclusions that deny AI-related losses unless specifically covered.
This is like denying a car accident claim because the vehicle was blue and the policy didn’t mention “blue cars.”
READ: Benchmark International on why they took center ice in downtown Tampa
Coverage should be determined by the nature of the harm, bodily injury, property damage, defamation, discrimination or privacy violation, not whether AI was involved. Yet ambiguity persists.
For executives, that gray area can translate to uncovered risk.
Where AI exposure hides
AI risk doesn’t always announce itself. It can surface in daily operations:
- Hiring: If an algorithm unintentionally filters out diverse candidates, discrimination claims may arise. Employment Practices Liability Insurance (EPLI) may respond — but only if AI use is recognized in the policy.
- Marketing: AI-generated content that misrepresents a competitor or violates privacy laws could trigger media or cyber liability. Coverage depends on how inclusive the policy language is.
- Operations: In transportation and manufacturing, AI-powered systems can cause physical harm or property damage. Whether driven by a human or an algorithm, the outcome determines liability.
AI doesn’t erase coverage. It complicates it.
Emerging executive risks
New forms of risk are also gaining attention:
- AI Washing: When companies overstate their AI capabilities in filings or marketing, it can lead to shareholder lawsuits or regulatory scrutiny. D&O policies should explicitly address these scenarios.
READ: Inside Mayor Jane Castor’s plan to fix Tampa traffic
- Data Poisoning: Attackers can corrupt algorithms by manipulating data. A strong cyber policy should cover both the breach and the AI system itself — provided exclusions don’t carve it out.
- Property Exposure: AI-driven systems in industrial settings can cause physical damage. Coverage language must evolve to match new forms of automation risk.
Strategic coverage, not static safety nets
For modern leaders, insurance is no longer a box to check. It’s a strategic shield — an integrated risk portfolio that adapts as technology evolves.
Smart executives are aligning corporate and personal coverage, embedding AI governance into policies and extending protection to families and staff. They’re training teams on cyber safety and elevating risk oversight to the board level.
At ME Wilson, we’ve seen how legacy policies can fail modern leaders — and how proactive, values-based strategies can close the Executive Risk Gap.
Insurance today must do more than safeguard a company. It must protect a life, a legacy and a brand.
That requires more than coverage. It requires clarity, conviction and a partner who understands what’s at stake.
Visit ME Wilson to learn more and explore executive coverage solutions designed for the AI age.